Search for: "Long v. US Dept. of Justice"
Results 221 - 240
of 346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
The First Department has long said the Kase test applies to §§ 175.05 and 175.10, most recently in 2018 in People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
See Grant v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm
Navajo Nation v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am
Hosp., 300 AD2d 592, 592 [2d Dept 2002]). [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:38 am
The Howard Case In Howard v Pooler, 184 AD3d 1160 [4th Dept 2020], a minority member of a real estate development firm sued the majority member. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
It was reported that the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division approved the use of predictive coding to respond to the DOJ’s request for information during its investigation of Anheuser-Busch Inbev’s acquisition of Mexican brewer Grupo Modelo. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
As Justice Scheinkman put it, "Fitzgerald and Maher, having not heard from Piekos, decided to force his hand by simply using their majority voting power to put their proposal into effect. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:40 am
The dispute in Rosen v Triebenbacher arose between the two fifty-percent members of Barrier Island Enterprises LLC (“BIE”), which owns and operates several beachside restaurants and bars in Long Beach Island, New Jersey, including Kubel’s Too Restaurant and Bar. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
Dept. of Justice, 150 F.Supp.2d 36, 41 (D.DC. 2001). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:30 pm
On Wednesday, in Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Guerra, 479 U.S. 272, 284 (1987) ("the background of [the statute's] legislative history and historical context").Wisconsin Dept. of Industry, Labor & Human Relations v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
Vuksanaj v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
That tribunal had been the subject of widespread and high-level criticism in relation to its fairness and independence, including from the US Dept of State and the Bar Human Rights Committee. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 2:11 am
Based on those unanimous rulings, the court in Farro v Schochet, __ AD3d __, 2021 NY Slip Op 00150 [2d Dept Jan. 13, 2021], granted my clients’ request to dismiss an action brought against them by a cashed-out minority member who sought to rescind the merger on grounds of alleged fraud and breach of fiduciary, and who also argued for rescission on the ground that he was not permitted to vote on the merger at a meeting of the members called on 20-days notice. [read post]
