Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am
On Wednesday 23rd November, the Court will hand down judgment in the Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998 [2022] UKSC 31. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
Those Progressives saw the administrative state as the sword of social justice, particularly in the New Deal era. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm
From Corso Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
" Truax v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Smolin, Kids Are Not Cakes: A Children's Rights Perspective on Fulton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
And finally…II Hargreaves v The District Probate Court [2022] EWHC 2605 (Ch) or, “What court would Jesus sue in? [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
There are 26 federative states (and the federal district) in Brazil, each of which have the powers to adopt their own Constitutions and laws, subject to the rules and principles provided for under the Federal Constitution. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
And the cases the Court will hear this year are noteworthy—affirmative action, voting rights, and the "independent state legislature doctrine," among others.But because I'm not a very political person, I'm interested in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am
” The Act states that the signature may be an electronic signature. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:36 am
The AG’s opinion certainly reads like he closely studied, and perhaps sought inspiration from, Lord Leggatt’s leading judgment in Lloyd v Google (see our analysis of that decision here). [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:07 am
Moreover, in Pioneer Aggregates (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1985] AC 132 the House of Lords held that there is no room for any principle of abandonment in planning law. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:13 am
He noted that in Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2021] UKSC 33, about an allegation of discrimination made by a postman of Nigerian ethnic origin, Lord Leggatt had said at paragraph [28] that “it did not matter if the employer had acted for an unfair or discreditable reason provided that the reason had nothing to do with the protected characteristic” [33]. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
Like Lady Poole, Lord Brailsford is a Senator of the College of Justice. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:49 am
And indeed, Lord Justice Arnold held that "[e]ach side has adopted its position in an attempt to game the system in its favour" and generally criticizes what he considers "the dysfunctional state of the current system for determining SEP/FRAND disputes. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:35 am
This state of affairs is problematic for two reasons. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The Lord Justices of the House of Lords stated in the case of Ranger v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:52 am
Annex V to the CRA sets the precise details of what the technical documentation must contain. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Willson v. [read post]
