Search for: "M & M Label Company, Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et al, 2000) •… [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I’m just saying that people are saying that. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 2:09 am
I'm sure this won't pass, the porn industry has tons of money to fight this... [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
Should we be grateful they didn't label it a "cat fight"? [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Ruzurgi® (amifampridine) 10 mg tablets have been recalled by Jacobus Pharmaceutical Company Inc. after the discovery of yeast, mold, and bacterial contamination. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am by Michael Grossman
The pharmaceutical giant Bayer, Inc. has announced a $66 billion dollar buyout of Monsanto. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfLast week's oral argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:51 am by Michael H Cohen
And he said, “Do you know, I’m concerned that someday marketing is going to be run by large companies fueled by AI, artificial intelligence, and big data. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no StrikeoutDarren covers another Arnoldian decision in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 223 (Pat). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 5:43 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
The lawsuit alleges that Actos' manufacturer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America (and other entities including: Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Takeda San Diego Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and Eli Lilly and Company), was negligent for not providing any warnings regarding the increased bladder cancer risk associated with Actos use. [read post]