Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 221 - 240
of 13,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 2:13 pm
., the GAO sustained a protest challenging the award of a task order by the International Boundary and Water Commission for a brand name or equal Caterpillar 980 wheel loader.[1] The agency issued the solicitation through GSA’s e-Buy system, stating that the proposed “wheel loader equipment must meet the salient features or specification of the Caterpillar 980 or exceed the specifications attached” and included a two-page specification sheet. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm
If I’m correct, it probably won’t take long to see a result, perhaps authored again by Kavanaugh. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
M. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:36 pm
§ 1. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
(b), 802.) [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:31 am
DOL Appeals EEO-1 FOIA Ruling to Ninth Circuit Court of AppealsBy Lauren B. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Under s. 5.4(1), a judge shall order that the property be forfeited to the Crown if they determine that the property in question is indeed the property described under a s. 4(1)(b) order and is owned, held, or controlled by the person in question. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:17 pm
” Read, Joffe, M. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 10:19 am
Core filings exclude M&A filings [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:37 am
The court found that defendants established that their methodology for pricing the corporation’s shares prior to the split was reasonable, and that even assuming defendants failed to obtain proper board approval under BCL 713(a)(1), the defendants established that the stock option plan was fair and reasonable as to the corporation at the time it was approved by defendants under Section 713(b). [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
But this was understandable as s.208(1) had not been raised by Ms M’s solicitors in the review process. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Requête en déclaration d’inconstitutionnalité de l’alinéa 1 g) sous-paragraphe 29 du Décret concernant l’ordonnance de mesures visant à protéger la santé de la population dans la situation de pandémie de la COVID-19 (décret 2-2021), des articles 123 paragraphe 8 et 139 de la Loi sur la santé publique ainsi que de l’avis gouvernemental du 9 janvier 2021.… [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
But the context is really simple: 1 name, 1 skater. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
It expressly provides that “[o]nly an objection . . . raised with reasonable specificity” in comments may be raised on judicial review. 42 U.S.C. s 7607(d)(7)(B). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 5:35 pm
How We Track Implementation Our updated tracker provides information on the implementation status of 39 requirements based on 1) the White House’s Fact Sheet; 2) announcements, or public statements, made by the responsible federal entities or officials; and 3) official documents, media reports, and other conclusive evidence regarding specific line items publicly available as of February 8, 2024. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
§45(m)(1)(B)) (see here) authorizes the FTC to seek civil penalties against a company that acted unfairly or deceptively. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:31 pm
Sec. 1(b)(2) is a big problem and more difficulties flow from it. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:09 am
Retrieved February 8, 2024, from https://www.nclc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/IB_Wage_Garnishment_Covid_and_Beyond.pdf[3] DeFusco, A., Enriquez, B., & Yellen, M. (2022, December 1). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:59 am
A continuación responde a las cuestiones prejudiciales más interesantes: el Acuerdo Marco debe interpretarse en el sentido de que se opone a una normativa nacional que no prevé ninguna de las medidas contempladas en esta disposición ni «medida legal equivalente» alguna, a efectos de esta, para evitar la utilización abusiva de contratos indefinidos no fijos. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
Still to come (maybe) 1. [read post]
