Search for: "MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT" Results 221 - 240 of 4,504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2023, 11:30 am by John Ross
And in state court news, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has elected to use its "extraordinary superintendence powers" and hold that about 27,000 defendants who pleaded guilty to DUI from 2011 to 2019 are entitled to a conclusive presumption of "egregious government misconduct" and to the suppression of the breathalyzer results if they seek to withdraw their plea—thanks to an investigation that uncovered "a history… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 7:28 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court reinstated a dismissed indictment alleging criminal conduct in the COVID response of a home for veterans The grand jury indicted the defendants, Bennett Walsh and David Clinton, the superintendent and medical director of the Soldiers'... [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 7:33 am by David Russcol
In the first major Massachusetts decision to address the fallout from Bruen, the Supreme Judicial Court held in Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:18 pm by Mark Ashton
Supreme Court case law on the subject the Massachusetts Court agreed with limitations. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 6:10 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has held that an attorney's conduct in the wake of an 18-month suspension constituted "text-book contempt" of the sanction In accordance with the order accompanying this decision, the respondent is further adjudged in contempt of... [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:10 am by Jeff Welty
This AP story from Florida reports that the Florida Supreme Court “removed Judge Elizabeth Scherer from overseeing any post-conviction proceedings for [an inmate recently sentenced to death]. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  He states up front that he will not address how legal scholars or the courts have interpreted the Amendment, except to assert, without any support, that James Madison and his colleagues "would have been astonished" at the Supreme Court's holding that the Amendment "grants individuals a right to have guns…. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court to be conditioned on the creation of an ethics code for the justices. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:41 am by Legal Profession Prof
A stayed six month suspension has been imposed by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for an attorney's conduct as appointed counsel in a child custody matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:58 am by Jeffrey Bellin
Massachusetts, for example, the court waved away similar complaints. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 7:30 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has reversed the denial of summary judgment to a legal malpractice defendant law firm This is an action for attorney malpractice. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 11:05 am
"Not the Supreme Court of the United States, admittedly — it really would be astounding if those pompous geriatric arseholes could take a break from sending women’s reproductive rights back to the Stone Age and legislate on something useful — just the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
It is possible Trump will seek to carry the fight up to the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:38 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has suspended an attorney for charging and collecting excessive fees This matter came before me on an Information and Record of Proceedings filed by the Board of Bar Overseers (board) in January, 2023, under S.J.C.... [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And despite a previous trip to the Supreme Court and a couple stops at the Sixth Circuit, the case is stuck on a pretty basic question: Can the now-former student even sue the officers at all? [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
The article then considers these stories (and Skinner's analysis of them) in light of two "hard" cases, one he discusses in his book and one recently decided by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, both concerning privacy in taking and dissemination of photographs. [read post]