Search for: "MATTER OF A J S" Results 221 - 240 of 19,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 8:27 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has isued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0698, 2012 MT 202N, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: S.M.J., Petitioner and Appellee, and T.I.J., Respondent and Appellee, and J.W., Intervenor and Appellant. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:26 pm
 Plaintiff’s argument relied on a comparison to New York law, which has statutory text similar to Maryland. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Dvornic • Wachtell Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz's Tijana J.... [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 3:15 am
Sept. 11, 2024 Lindhardt, J.), the court addressed Preliminary Objections filed against a Defendant’s New Matter in a medical malpractice action. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 1:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
As a result, Nebraska's unusual supermajority requirement for invalidating statutes—the requirement that five of the seven Justices agree that a statute is unconstitutional before it can be invalidated—appears not to be dispositive here.The post 7 J——-S, 8 Opinions appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:05 am
However, since Blair J was not explicitly referring to the Arbitration Act, and was rejecting the exercise of the Court’s inherent jurisdiction and its case management powers, this passage is not conclusive of the section 9 question. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:27 pm by LawDiva
None of the witnesses that Bailey asserts would have changed Simpson’s case, mattered a whit. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:56 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Barr, 954 F.3d 812 (5th Cir. 2020); Matter of J-F-F-, 23 I&N Dec. 912, 922 (A.G. 2006); Matter of S-M-J-, 21 I&N Dec. 722, 723-24, 28-29 (BIA 1997); see also Quintero v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
Should a landlord fail to adhere to that requirement, the unit(s) in question may remain subject to stabilization until voluntarily vacated by the tenant(s) after the J-51 benefits period has expired. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 9:17 am by Koz
Upon consideration of relator's motion to expedite and foremergency review and motion for stay of proceedings in lower court and toadvance matter on the court's docket,IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions are denied.Pfeifer, J., dissents.Lanzinger, J., not participating.MEDIATION REFERRALSThe following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant toS.Ct.Prac.R. [read post]