Search for: "MATTER OF L K" Results 221 - 240 of 1,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2022, 8:02 am by Aron Laszlo (Oppenheim Legal)
Under Hungarian law, if a party wishes to request a review of a second instance decision from the Kúria in an IP-related matter, the party needs to examine closely whether the first and second instance court decisions are based on the same legal provisions and reasoning. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
In today’s blog post, we share some interesting Question and Answer responses recently provided by the Department of State’s Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Consular Affairs (L/CA), in a meeting with the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:38 am by Katherine Pompilio
The discussion will be moderated by Brookings senior fellow Daniel L. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 7:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
Bach, fuming from the experience, reported the matter to the church court. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 2:12 pm by Al Saikali
I then describe the FPPA in detail, but by pulling various pieces of the 34-page law together by subject matter. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
As my article notes, courts do make exceptions to the litigate-in-your-own-name rule, and there are plausible arguments that pseudonymous litigation should be more commonly allowed; but this is still a good articulation of the dominant view: Pilots X, Y, Z, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, & M sued Boeing about its 737 MAX airplanes. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 12:21 pm by Emily Dai
Bernard-Henri Lévy, philosopher, filmmaker and author of the book, “The will to see: dispatches from a world of misery and hope,” will open the discussion with keynote remarks. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to whether Pasternak’s negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiffs’ losses, we cannot conclude as a matter of law, — in view of Pasternak’s urging plaintiffs to use Sprei — that Sprei’s misconduct was independent of Pasternak’s (compare Excelsior Capitol LLC v K&L Gates LLP, 138 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2016] [malpractice claim dismissed for lack of proximate cause where trial… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Giles Peaker
  Ms K was ordered to pay Ms L £10,000 in costs under Rule 13. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
No matter what the Court does in the SB 8 cases, we will never know why it allowed an obviously unconstitutional law to take effect in the first place and permitted it to continue in effect for at least 100 days. [read post]