Search for: "MATTER OF N B" Results 221 - 240 of 5,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 7:33 am
Our nonprofit has filed Form 990 (or 990-EZ or 990-N) every year, and we always have to list the organization's principal officer. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:45 am
Addressed to white parents, it warned: “Don’t let your daughter date blacks, it might be a matter of life and death. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:16 pm
ER 8.4(d), and Rule 31(b), ARIZ.R.S.CT.Our Arizona correspondent says he has only one comment to make, echoing the phrase near the very end of the summary: "character or reputation"? [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:42 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The only person who testified was the supervisor, who lacked any direct knowledge of the matter at all. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Any disclosure in the description inconsistent with the amended subject-matter should normally be excised. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm by mjpetro
We must first determine whether the convictions are directed toward establishing a matter in issue other than Hicks's propensity to sell drugs. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The examining division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request and auxiliary requests 1 and 3 to 5 was excluded from patentability pursuant to Article 53(b) EPC as it constituted an essentially biological process for the production of plants. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:53 pm by Howard Friedman
B. 8 permits the Medical Board to discipline physicians for violating the statute despite the Act’s command that “the requirements of this subchapter shall be enforced exclusively through . . . private civil actions,” “[n]otwithstanding . . . any other law. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an opportunity… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an opportunity… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an opportunity… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an opportunity… [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Ironically, the Board’s published decision noted above in Matter of Francisco-Alonzo, 26 I&N Dec. 594 (BIA 2015) which mandates the use of the “ordinary case” analysis for crimes of violence, has likely already been overruled by this decision. [read post]