Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 221 - 240
of 21,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
For example, in Ashwander v Tennessee Valley Authority, the Supreme Court explained that Article 3 prevents the court from considering “the constitutionality of legislation in a friendly, non-adversary proceeding,” as with abstract review. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
After all, he said, “information is knowledge, and knowledge is power”. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
No matter, for it sought to commandeer the states. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Ruling in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Maryland to NFIB v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:04 pm
Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL) Section 11-1.1 entitled “Fiduciaries’ powers” provides a list of the powers that fiduciaries can exercise. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
Remember that in private law matters anything that the law does not prohibit may be done. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:02 am
Michael Lampe et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:02 am
Michael Lampe et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:30 am
In Barker v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:38 am
In the recent case of Heller v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:38 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:23 am
Regina (A) v Director of Establishments of the Security Service Queen’s Bench Division “The Investigatory Powers Tribunal did not have exclusive jurisdiction where a claim that a public authority proposed to act in a way incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights brought up matters within its purview. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 10:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
I've been on the road this week, so I have just now had a chance to digest the transcript of the oral argument in American Electric Power v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
That is exactly what the Court did last term in Arizona v. [read post]
Florida Amendment 5 & New Hampshire CACR 26: Giving legislatures more power over judicial rulemaking
30 Aug 2012, 8:47 am
The legislature shall have a concurrent power to regulate the same matters by statute. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:43 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
The only real justification the government advanced for the subject being a matter of Federal law was the Commerce Clause, but the 4th Circuit relied on a couple of Supreme Court decisions in the past decade or so in rejecting that argument.The first was US v. [read post]
