Search for: "MATTER OF R B" Results 221 - 240 of 14,663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Although better than the proposed rule,[1] the final beneficial ownership reporting rule continues to rest on flawed economics. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:26 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The Board of Immigration Appeals in Matter of W-E-R-B -, 27 I&N Dec. 795 (BIA 2020) ruled that an INTERPOL Red Notice may constitute reliable evidence of criminality that serves as a bar for asylum and withholding of removal. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:45 pm by Michael Oykhman
However, in Canada, the legality of public nudity is a matter that largely depends on the specific circumstances and location. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:27 pm by Michael Oykhman
R v Moyer held that section 182(b) does not apply to offering indignities to monuments per se, however, it does apply to offering indignities to monuments that mark human remains. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:35 am by Daniel J. Gilman
And, not to quibble about semantics—not more than my baseline rate of quibbling, at any rate—but launching a study under Section 6(b) of the FTC Act is not the same as completing it or [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Administrative Law Matters 2. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm by Giles Peaker
What mattered were the specific facts, There were no issues of conduct to be taken into account. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 8:08 am by Andrews & Thornton
Asuncion, Jr., and Hawai‘i State Energy Office’s Chief Energy Officer Mark B. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:14 am by Eugene Volokh
[But we conclude that, b]ecause the overall thrust and dominant theme of Freborg's post—based on its content, form, and context—involved a matter of public concern, namely, sexual assault in the context of the #MeToo movement, her statement is entitled to heightened protection under the First Amendment …. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:11 pm by Russell Knight
R. 11(b) Petitions for emergency orders of protection are often the first filings between two parties. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The BIA determined that Avila’s PSG did not “exist independently” of the harm alleged, as required under Matter of M-E-V-G-113 and Matter of W-G-R-. 114 Matter of M-E-V-G- cites to this Court’s prior precedent in Lukwago v. [read post]