Search for: "MATTER OF R M B" Results 221 - 240 of 3,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2015, 1:14 pm
In 2002, Think Tank sued Chester as well as former Think Tank employees Mike Heinhold, John Mario, Joel Parker, Thomas Guelinas, Jon Meyer, Daniel Curry, Eric M. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 4:13 pm
For that matter, a commercial bankruptcy lawyer has a similar concern, so he may want a ten million dollar retainer. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
Matter of M-J-K-, 26 I&N Dec. 773 (BIA 2016): In another case displaying the Board’s focus on mental health issues in immigration court, the Board stated that an immigration judge has the discretion to determine the appropriate safeguards in a case under of Matter of M-A-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 474 (BIA 2011). [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:44 am by Peter Groves
 In each case the claimant invoked art.9(1)(a) (double identity) and (b) (likelihood of confusion) and in the case of the "M" device art.9(1)(c) (unfair advantage) as well, and all three infringements had associated passing off claims. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:11 am by Trey Childress
  447 Haroune Ould Ahmed – Les réserves à caractère religieux …………….. [read post]
Ugh
25 Apr 2012, 7:33 pm by TDot
Miss a single point and I’m down to an A-; miss 3 or more puts me in B+-and-below territory. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Second, several Code provisions, such as section 26(b)(2), 401(k)(8)(D), (m)(7)(A), 414(w)(1)(B), and 877A(g)(6), expressly refer to the section 72(t) additional tax by using the unmodified term “tax”. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 8:12 am by Sean Hanover
See 29 U.S.C. 203(m) [definition of "wage"], 29 U.S.C. 211(c) [description of record keeping requirements], 29 U.S.C. 216(B) [penalties for failure to comply]. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:13 pm by Giesela Ruehl
On 24 May 2012 Advocate General Villalón delivered his opinion in Mühlleitner (C-190/11) concerning the interpretation of Article 15 (1) lit. c) of the Brussels I-Regulation. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
C'est qu'en effet, le droit des brevets confère un monopole limité pour permettre au titulaire de bénéficier de la récompense financière qu'il mérite, promouvant ainsi l'innovation. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 2:30 pm by David Lat
[Dewey B Strategic] * Congratulations to the six new participants in LexisNexis's third Silicon Valley Legal Tech Accelerator program! [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:56 am by Michael Risch
Perhaps I'm being a pessimist; I sure hope so. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
B&M argues that Cambridge North Point “quietly” inserted plain language into the draft settlement agreement requiring B&M to make a $3.5 million settlement payment during the negotiations in a way that led B&M to overlook it, and B&M signed that agreement without noticing the new commitment. [read post]