Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 221 - 240
of 53,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The first two conditions of R 76(2)(c) are therefore clearly fulfilled.[1.4] With respect to the last condition (facts and evidence), according to the established case law the notice of opposition must indicate the “when”, “what” and under “what circumstances”, in particular “to whom”, the alleged public prior use was made available (T 522/94 [headnote IV, 10, 12, 20 to 25]; T 328/87 [3.3]).[1.5] In the present case, the… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
According to R 137(3), no further amendment may be made without the consent of the Examining Division (ED). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
G 1/05 [11.1] and T 600/08 [2.3]. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
In the present case, however, the ED had refused to (immediately) issue a communication pursuant to R 71(3). [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In T 1459/05 [4.3] the board decided not to adopt the existing jurisprudence, according to which there was no power to examine matters of clarity under A 84 when the amendment consisted of a combination of claims as granted. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:14 am
matters, more ? [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
And, given the financial incentive, won't lots of matters be "over half done? [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:00 am
I usually find a hidden account when someone is sloppy: a transfer to a bank that we didn’t know about, no matter how large or small the amount. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact this obligation is shaped by the circumstances of each case. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:09 am
John R. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:37 pm
"We don't know what the final vote was and it doesn't really matter," he said. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 12:42 pm
Couric doesn't apologize, either. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 8:18 am
I hate the title, "Ten Reasons Why China Matters to You," and I also think some of the ten were tossed out just to get to ten. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
In such a case, the claim does not meet the requirements of A 84, because A 84, first sentence, when read in conjunction with R 43(1) and (3), has to be interpreted as meaning not only that an independent claim must be comprehensible from a technical point of view but also that it must clearly define the subject-matter of the invention, that is to say indicate all the essential features thereof (see T 32/82). [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In the decision under appeal it was held that it does, because the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799 […]. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:26 pm
In a recent 4-2 decision In the Matter of Nicholas R. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
The very tiniest particles that make up all of the matter that we can’t see are being discovered by the largest single machine ever created on planet Earth. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 8:59 pm
I think that's because some people simply don't think that we have available to us such a concept today, at least with respect to public service. [read post]
