Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 221 - 240 of 41,946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 1:57 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  If a person is subject to HGN-testing in the immediate aftermath of rapid movement or other trauma, vestibular nystagmus should not be ruled out as a possible explanation for the presence of nystagmus. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:38 am by Gregory Lars Gunnerson
The Whitman Saddle Court addressed the matter by reference to “the inventive faculty. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:47 am by Chris Sutton
Preserve Relevant Documents and Evidence Preserving evidence is important. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:10 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
” More to Read The post Jury rules against Black Lives Matter co-founder in LAPD ‘swatting’ lawsuit appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
” Second, Kagan accused the majority of “invent[ing] a new rule of evidence” – the submission of an alternative map – “to burden plaintiffs in racial-gerrymandering cases. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:50 am by Mark Ashton
”  In 1986 the Superior Court issued its ruling in Miller v. [read post]
The bill mirrors the federal standard in the Federal Rule of Evidence, which states: In a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of an offense of sexual assault, evidence of the defendant’s commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault is admissible, and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:39 am by Amir C. Tayrani
” It is unfathomable that Congress, in one half of one subsection of a provision addressing procedural matters, provided the FTC with the far-reaching power to issue substantive rules categorically condemning economic practices as unfair methods of competition on a nationwide basis. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm by Law Lady
Torts -- Defamation per se -- Trial court's verbatim adoption of defendant's proposed final judgment does not require reversal where it was evident that final judgment reflected trial court's independent decision on issues in the case -- Both parties were al [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
That doesn’t matter, because anyone who “orders, solicits, or induces” others to commit Rome Statute crimes can be charged as a principal (art. 25(3)(b)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:44 am by Cyberleagle
Those “persons or matters” can be described as the relationships of a foreign corporation with users of its services who are outside (and have no connection with) Australia. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:30 am by Todd Buchwald
And notwithstanding its concerns about the Court, the United States played a significant role in shaping the ICC’s Elements of Crimes and its Rules of Procedure and Evidence as well as in helping in its investigations. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
This rule applies as a matter of constitutional interpretation by North Carolina’s appellate courts; the United States Supreme Court has not weighed in on whether the Fifth Amendment bars the substantive use of a defendant’s invocation of his right to remain silent before the defendant is arrested. [read post]