Search for: "MATTER OF S C B C and J C" Results 221 - 240 of 2,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lemley: we do feel differently about McKenna’s point b/c of vestigial instinct that you got to choose b/t regimes. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Despite the agency's diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 12 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Homes and Communities Agency v J S Bloor (Wilmslow) Ltd. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus, the [applicant] was entitled to file on its motion matter that it considered to be missing.[7] The references to “missing” drawings appearing in each of paragraphs (1) to (3) of R 56 must be interpreted consistently with each other to give a meaningful effect to the rule as a whole (see also J 27/10 [10]). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by INFORRM
(c)  Sweeney J, Eady J, Mann J and Vos J? [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Home and Communities Agency v J S Bloor (Wilmslow) Ltd, heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  It doesn’t work b/c it’s been turned into notice and takedown by the courts. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”[2] The subject matter of decision G 1/09 was a divisional application filed after a decision refusing the parent application had been rendered, but before the appeal period had expired. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:25 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sec. 3574(b)(4)), and $500,000 for organizations (id. at Sec. 574(c)(4)). [read post]