Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 221 - 240
of 53,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Under R 80 the proprietor was entitled to react to a new factual situation by making “appropriate and necessary amendments” occasioned by grounds of opposition. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:42 pm
I DON'T THINK THE ACTIVE VOICE IS APPROPRIATE HERE: "No matter what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The feature should allow to distinguish [the claimed subject-matter] from spheres or polyhedral shapes derived from spheres, which have no such circumferential face. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
Such exceptions are set forth, in particular, in R 70(1) (no withdrawal of the request for examination) and in R 84(2) (possible continuation of opposition proceedings after withdrawal of the opposition). [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
The opponent omitted to pay this fee, which triggered a notification of loss or rights under R 112(1). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present case, the absence of explanation, both of the evidence itself and of its late production, makes matters worse. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 8:32 am
Final thoughtsIn this latest decision therefore, the Board of Appeal expressly disagreed with the conclusions of T 1989/18 and T 1444/20 (and now T 2194/19), and agreed with T 1024/18 and T 2766/17 (r. 34). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:22 pm
On May 14, Governor DeSantis (R, Bizarro-Land)'s stay at home order expired. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(a) Since this newly introduced feature had clearly not yet been the subject-matter of the previous proceedings, the appellant did not have an opportunity to present its comments on the examining division's opinion.However, in this regard it must additionally be taken into account that the appellant in its letter of 22 February 2017 stated that the feature at issue "can also be omitted if regarded as violating Art 123(2)EPC". [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(a) Since this newly introduced feature had clearly not yet been the subject-matter of the previous proceedings, the appellant did not have an opportunity to present its comments on the examining division's opinion.However, in this regard it must additionally be taken into account that the appellant in its letter of 22 February 2017 stated that the feature at issue "can also be omitted if regarded as violating Art 123(2)EPC". [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
This legal opinion of the Board is in keeping with the decision T 1122/01 cited above and the principles for the preparation of OPs as set out by decision G 4/95 of the EBA. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:37 am
Also, in the written procedure before the Opposition Division, there is no apparent attack on such a heating device subject matter which is based on E1 as the closest prior art and which combines E12. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
R 44 EPC 1973), this concerns the content of the European search report. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the Board concludes that the appeal complies with the requirements of A 108 and R 99(2) and is admissible. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/b1KxAiOc8Jw" height="1" width="1"/> [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Furthermore, the Board held that as a direct result of the patentee’s own tactical choice, the matter of the appeal proceedings had been limited from the broader version of the claims to a much more restricted subject-matter by limiting the feature (g). [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 6:59 pm
As a matter of fact, research indicates that innocent people tend to be more nervous when they are being questioned because they are very intent on proving that they didn't do it. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:10 am
Doesn't matter. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
The board is however of the opinion that such is not the case (r.6.1). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
The board is however of the opinion that such is not the case (r.6.1). [read post]
