Search for: "MATTER OF T B"
Results 221 - 240
of 19,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 7:49 pm
Nice try by B of A's PR flacks, though. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm
It does matter practically, but shouldn't. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am
T 727/00, Reasons, point 1.1.4).1.6.3 The board notes, however, that most decisions following this well-established approach relate to amendments based on lists of non-con [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
It also raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC and for lack of novelty against the auxiliary request.It attached to its letter the following new item of evidence:D35: Copy of the Mr T B van Aken's publicly available entry in the "Linkedin" database.XI. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:25 pm
” Similarly, after his son told a teacher that the B-SHOC event would not be fun for him because he is an atheist, the teacher instructed, “I wouldn’t brag about that. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Note that the Board also does not mention T 1989/18 of 16.12.2021 that concluded that, as a general rule, not is not required to bring the description in line with (amended) claims intended for grant.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
The Juvenile Code defines a custodian in the context of a delinquency matter as “[t]he person or agency that has been awarded legal custody of a juvenile by a court. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is not novel over the disclosure of document 2(3). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
A further repetition of the process of Example 8 performed by the appellant, the experimental details of which were provided in Annex B of letter dated 8 March 2013, confirmed said conclusion. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:27 am
But as Coach Wooden would say, “Don’t let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
(b) The duration of the marriage. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
In decision T 142/05, it was considered that the deletion in the description of an important desired property of the claimed subject-matter led to an extension of the scope of protection. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:01 am
In the Matter of Marcy B. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:17 am
(b) The appeal was admissible, essentially for the reasons set out in the provisional opinion of the Board. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:48 am
It’s wrong and we won’t be bullied. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
adjusting the dry matter content of the sol. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Nevertheless, [the opponent] is of the opinion that the remaining product claims are still directed to subject-matter excluded from patentability by A 53(b). [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:23 pm
This is true both in law schools and in B schools. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
(b) The mist generator comprises a mist channelling funnel (Nebelkanaltrichter), and the water level sensor is provided at the height of the bottom edge of the mist channelling funnel(c) The water reservoir comprises a water overflow pipe (Wasserüberlauf) at the height of the water level sensor.As the present main request corresponds to t [read post]
