Search for: "MATTER OF T B"
Results 221 - 240
of 20,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 9:05 pm
CDR B: The government would not dispute that matter, Your Honor. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 2:40 pm
PoliceDep’t, 556 F.3d 1075, 1083 (9th Cir. 2009).Likewise, a “party cannot raise arguments in its post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) that it did not raise in its pre-verdict Rule 50(a) motion. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
I for one am happy to see that T 307/03 (where the Board held that a double patenting objection can be raised also where there is only an overlap of the subject matter claimed in distinct applications) appears to be more and more isolated. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 2:30 pm
It doesn’t matter what’s on your form W-4. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
I suspect that If your clothes were submitted to a blind detergent test you likely couldn’t tell which had been washed in detergent A and which in detergent B if your life depended on it. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
It is in conformity with decisions T 931/95 [8], T 641/00 [6], T 258/03 [5.3] and T 531/03 [2.5] which stipulate that for the assessment of inventive step account should be taken of only those features which contribute to the technical character of the claimed subject-matter. [5] Thus, for assessing inventive step of the method of claim 1, the first and fundamental question to be answered is whether, also in the light of the description […], the… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm
It does matter practically, but shouldn't. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am
T 727/00, Reasons, point 1.1.4).1.6.3 The board notes, however, that most decisions following this well-established approach relate to amendments based on lists of non-con [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 7:49 pm
Nice try by B of A's PR flacks, though. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
It also raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC and for lack of novelty against the auxiliary request.It attached to its letter the following new item of evidence:D35: Copy of the Mr T B van Aken's publicly available entry in the "Linkedin" database.XI. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Note that the Board also does not mention T 1989/18 of 16.12.2021 that concluded that, as a general rule, not is not required to bring the description in line with (amended) claims intended for grant.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:25 pm
” Similarly, after his son told a teacher that the B-SHOC event would not be fun for him because he is an atheist, the teacher instructed, “I wouldn’t brag about that. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
The Juvenile Code defines a custodian in the context of a delinquency matter as “[t]he person or agency that has been awarded legal custody of a juvenile by a court. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is not novel over the disclosure of document 2(3). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
A further repetition of the process of Example 8 performed by the appellant, the experimental details of which were provided in Annex B of letter dated 8 March 2013, confirmed said conclusion. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:27 am
But as Coach Wooden would say, “Don’t let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
(b) The duration of the marriage. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
In decision T 142/05, it was considered that the deletion in the description of an important desired property of the claimed subject-matter led to an extension of the scope of protection. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:01 am
In the Matter of Marcy B. [read post]
