Search for: "MATTER OF V K"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2023, 3:05 pm
From Osowski v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:07 am
In the one New York case I’ve blogged about in the last 15 years in which allegations of de facto dividends were prominent — Feldmeier v Feldmeier Equipment, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In City of Houston v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Schwartz reviews the long line of cases beginning with Harlow v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
It is true enough that Judge K is batting 1.000 in the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
And there is the matter that the anonymous critic was offering a criticism that was also not peer reviewed. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
See, e.g., the Fourth Circuit's recent opinion in PETA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Many start with and later add investors to ongoing funds and matters. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
Colleagues Brian Albrecht (and here), Alden Abbott, Gus Hurwitz, and Corbin K. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:19 am
From McKenna v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
"; and WHEREAS in Healy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
That is exactly what happened in the case of Sammarco v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
Although the K-1s and representations are not dispositive, they are still relevant (see Rakosi v Sidney Rubell Co., LLC, 155 AD3d 564, 565 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
”); Matter of T.T., 479 P.3d 598 (Or. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
In their view, the decision conflicts with more than 50 years of precedent and inappropriately extends Section 11 liability far beyond the distribution of securities in and around Slack’s direct listing of shares (Slack Technologies, LLC (f/k/a Slack Technologies, Inc.) v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Among others, VC Laster cited Caremark itself, the equating of officer duties with director duties in Gantler v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Among others, VC Laster cited Caremark itself, the equating of officer duties with director duties in Gantler v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:50 am
So says the State Bureau of Investigation in this memo: “Police narcotics [K-9s] cannot tell the difference between hemp and marijuana because the [K-9s] are trained to detect THC which is present in both plants. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[by] name or other reasonable technological effort" (Matter of Pflaum v Grattan, 116 AD3d 1103, 1104 [3d Dept 2014]; see Matter of Reclaim the Records v New York State Dept. of Health, 185 AD3d 1268, 1269 [3d Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 910 [2021]). [read post]
