Search for: "MATTER OF W C"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
Duration didn’t matter b/c the book wasn’t going to be printed again. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
By: John W. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:20 am
One of the things NAD said was that it found that the primary economic motivation was editorial content, but if a publisher created content w/intent to motivate consumers to buy through affiliate links, that could be advertising w/in NAD jurisdiction b/c it’s like other advertising. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
Andrew Gilden: how much does ROP matter when it mostly seems to implement passing off? [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited &… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent), heard 24 – 27 January 2011 R (on the… [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am
On Thursday 18 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in In the matter of XY (Scotland). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Meridian Limited), heard 22-24… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Meridian Limited), heard 22-24… [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
In the matter of an application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (NI), heard 30 Apr 2018. [read post]
2 May 2022, 9:50 am
Part I of IV: Solving The More-w/-Less Dilemma Part III of IV: What Currently Impedes Legal from Doing Its Job Part IV of IV: How the C-Suite and Board Can Achieve a Re-Set [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Fame for dilution is either/or, while confusion is a matter of degree. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Patent and Trademark Office interprets this to mean no, never, no matter what. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
Mostly b/c of the way that computers work. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
In patent/© money matters a lot; is it b/c there’s a consumer interest where the consumer doesn’t benefit if $ changes hands? [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:45 am
C. 1.9(a), as amended, 490 Mass. 1305 (2022), existed. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
In the matter of D (a child), heard 3-4 Oct 2018. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:08 am
In June 2021, the European Union submitted a different proposal, which favoured the use of the existing compulsory licensing mechanism under the TRIPS Agreement (IP/C/W/681). [read post]
6 May 2022, 7:15 am
Part I of IV: Solving The More-w/-Less Dilemma Part II of IV: C-Suite Must Say What it Wants from Legal Part IV of IV: How the C-Suite Can Achieve a Re-Set [read post]
