Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 221 - 240
of 119,965
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:10 pm
Indeed, the May 6 Letter objects specifically to the “ideological homogeneity” it attributes to Columbia’s faculty and administration and insists that the boycott will continue until there is “[v]iewpoint diversity on the faculty and across the administration—including the admissions office. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm
Alejandro Mayorkas, et al. and Pars Equality Center, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 2:40 pm
I suspect the vote will be close either way.And then the Supreme Court may well take the case up.In short, I suspect this is very much not the last word on this subject.We'll see. [read post]
Supreme Court Hands a Blow to Small-Business Succession Planning in Connelly v. U.S., by Sam Sturgis
17 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm
On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court held in Connelly v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:38 pm
§ 405(a); Norma Ribbon & Trimming, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:20 am
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:02 am
Insulet Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am
* When Lawyer A opens the file using the link, he or she discovers the link provides access to B's client's documents which were not expected to be disclosed and are likely to be considered confidential.This is what happened in a recent case in New York called Pursuit Credit Special Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:51 am
SIZ-4783 at 9 (May 10, 2006). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:06 am
Earlier this year, it was referenced in the hearings at the International Court of Justice for the case of South Africa v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
These questions were answered in the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Ratz-Cheung v BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
These questions were answered in the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Ratz-Cheung v BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
On 15 May 2024, the UK Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment in the case RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV,[1] addressing the modern approach to be taken to FMCs under English law, as well as taking the opportunity to examine the relationship between concepts of autonomy and certainty of contract on the one hand, and what might have been seen as commercial pragmatism on the other. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:18 pm
In Sonzinski v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:20 pm
Dep’t of Commerce, and Loper Bright Enters. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:02 am
In this sense, decisions like those of the US Copyright Office in Zarya of the Dawn [IPKat here] and the Beijing Internet Court in Li v Liu [IPKat here] are helpful. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:32 am
” NY Times “The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to limit access to a widely used abortion medication, rejecting a challenge from antiabortion doctors two years after the court’s conservative majority overturned Roe v. [read post]
