Search for: "MERCK SHARP " Results 221 - 240 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 3:20 pm
Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme BV, and Merck Sharp & Dohme and Paranova Danmark A/S and Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme and Merck Sharp & Dohme BV is only available on the Curia website in a random selection of official European Union languages that does not include Maltese, Bulgarian or English, but the IPKat wouldn't like to think that any dispute… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm by Marie Louise
Teva and ratiopharm (EPLAW) Fentanyl – Germany: Federal Court of Justice: Lessons to be learned for claim construction and novelty: Xa ZR 149/07 (Kluwer Patent Blog) Finasteride – France: Tribunale de Grande Instance de Paris: Murder me twice – Merck’s dosage regime patent held invalid again: Teva v Merck Sharp & Dohme (EPLAW) Gaviscon (Sodium alginate, Sodium bicarbonate, Calcium carbonate) – UK: Reckitt Benckiser fined £10.2 M for… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08 April 2011) High Court… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:43 am
In my article "Divided by a common language: US and UK patent law" which was published in Science, People & Politics (April to June 2011) I noted that one of the differences between US and UK patent law was that 35 USC 102 (b) of the US act permits an application for a US patent even where the invention has been described in a publication or application for a foreign patent that has been made in [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions comprising… [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 4:48 am by Layla Kuhl
In Attorney General v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, the Court of Appeals panel majority held that “plaintiffs’ allegations fall within the statutory definition of “product liability  action,”  because  plaintiffs  have  asserted  legal  and  equitable  theories  of  liability  for damage to property resulting from the production of a product. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm by Editors
., Flex-Time Lawyers, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., National Corporate Research, Ltd., and The Vanguard Group Learn more at New Partner and In-House Counsel Conference. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
Merck & Co., 2003 WL 22902622, at *3 n.3 (E.D. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Bexis
When the Levine, Riegel, and Kent cases were briefed in the United States Supreme Court, we provided our readers with “users’ guides”/”guided tours” that summarized the defense side arguments and pointed out whatever we thought was interesting.Today we’re continuing that tradition with the Bruesewitz (sooner or later we’ll memorize how to spell that) v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Only yesterday the IPKat reported on Case C-207/10 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme is upon us. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
(Patent Docs) Cubicin (Daptomycin) – US: Cubist Pharmaceuticals to oppose Teva’s attempt to add inequitable conduct defense in patent infringement action (SmartBrief) Dorzolamide/Timolol – Netherlands: Preliminary injunction judge rules UK invalidity decision not sufficient to rule non-negligible chance that (Dutch part of) patent will be invalidated in proceedings on the merits: Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:13 am
Soon after the Dutch customs authorities realized that the generic drugs manufactured in India had existing valid patents for Losartan® in the EU, they informed the company that holds the patents for that drug - Merck Sharp & Dohme - which quickly obtained an injunction to restrain the importation transit procedure".The IPKat keeps getting puzzled by all of this. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
"   Merck filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:30 am
(Patent Docs) Atripla (Emtricitabine) - US: District Court S D New York: Patent infringement suit filed following a Paragraph IV Certification: Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Does she think that Merck is paying me to speak about vaccines? [read post]