Search for: "MGN"
Results 221 - 240
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 5:31 pm
The judge noted that although he “inclined to agree” that the publication of the photographs per se served little public interest, it is the public interest in the non-disclosure of press sources that the court must protect – “As forcefully pointed out by Laws LJ in the Ashworth Hospital Authority case [Ashworth Hospital Authority v MGN Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2033], such public interest is constant whatever the merits of the particular publication. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
There is still a tension between the ruling of the House of Lords (as it then was) in Campbell v MGN and the subsequent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Von Hannover v Germany. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:04 pm
It is well established that this “view” can exist both before and after publication (Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:30 pm
In 2011, the Court held in MGN Ltd v United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 66 that 100% uplifts on CFAs (when paid by the losing party) was also a breach of free speech rights. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:00 am
I attended the contempt “trial” in July (politely referred to as “the attorney general’s application for a motion for committal”) of MGN Limited and News Group Newspapers Limited, respectively publishers of the Daily Mirror and the Sun, on a watching brief basis. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:44 am
That submission recommended that the lead in England and Wales be followed, as did the Department of Journalism (pdf) in the School of Media, Dublin Institute of Technology, the Business Journalists’ Association(pdf), Google (pdf), MGN (pdf), NewsBrands Ireland (pdf), and Ronan Daly Jermyn (pdf). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Representative Claimants v MGN ([2015] EWCA Civ 1291). [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Discusses MGN Ltd v UK (App No. 39401/04) on whether the requirement that the defendant newspaper pay the claimant’s costs in a privacy case under a conditional fee agreement that included success fees of 95 and 100% was disproportionate and breached the newspaper’s right to freedom of expression under ECHR, art 10. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:27 pm
In Gulati v MGN [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 – one of the phone-hacking cases – the Court of Appeal affirmed the principle that damages for non-pecuniary loss for the misuse of private information should have some “reasonable relationship” with damages for personal injury. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:27 am
Another possibility is Ferdinand v MGN - where the appeal was disposed of by consent on 18 December 2011 – although there was no injunction in place in that case either. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:27 am
Although it is agreed that this alert system complies with Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, safeguarding the right to freedom of expression and the press, there is no point at which Article 10 trumps Article 8 (Campbell v MGN [2004] UKHL 22 and In Re S [2004] UKHL 47). [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017 Isle of Wight Council v Platt, heard 31 January 2017 Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017 IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd v Nigeria National Petroleum Corp, heard 2 February 2017 Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd, heard 6 February 2017 Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd, heard 7 February 2017 Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council, heard 8-9 February… [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
A defamation claim, the Claim form and Particulars of Claim are available on Lawtel [£] Court of Appeal We are aware of one media and information law appeal listed in the Court of Appeal this term: Various Claimants v MGN Limited, 12 or 13 February 2019, Appeal against a judgment of Mann J. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi & Anor v Clarke [2011] EWCA Civ 937 (29 July 2011)… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind The Perils of “Revenge… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm
This is an appeal from a decision of Tugendhat J [2014] EWHC 1170 (QB) Cooke v MGN, Permission to Appeal granted by judge on 26 September 2014. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm
A judge might decide, though, that the photographs are a different matter and, as in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, that they go too far. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) – and that Mr Justice Eady was not party to a single one of these decisions (although appeals against his rulings were dismissed in McKennitt and Lord Browne). [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
There were 11 judgments after the trials of preliminary issues in libel cases Spicer v Commissioner of Police of Metropolis [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) Travel Insurance Facilities v Times [2019] EWHC 1337 (QB) Allen v Times Newspapers [2019] EWHC 1235 (QB) Feyziyev v The Journalism Development Network Association [2019] EWHC 957 (QB) Rochester v Ingham House Ltd [2019] EWHC 847 (QB) Hewson v Times Newspapers Ltd [2019] EWHC 650 (QB) Poroshenko v BBC [2019] EWHC 213 (QB) Koutsogiannis v The Random House… [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
We are aware of the following media law cases due which are due to be heard in the courts of England and Wales in the Michaelmas term Libel Trials Yeo v Times Newspapers Ltd 12 October 2015 (time estimate, 7 days) Umayor v Nwalcamma 12 October 2015 (time estimate, 3 days) Wilkes v Wilshaw 23 November 2015 ((time estimate, 2 days) Harassment and Privacy trials Walliams v Associates Newspapers and ors, 16 November 2015 (time estimate, 5 days) Brand & anr v Berki 30 Nov (time… [read post]
