Search for: "MOODY V US" Results 221 - 240 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 1:05 am by Kevin LaCroix
 This article highlights the following topics involving Chinese reverse merger companies:      PCAOB's Research Note on Chinese reverse mergers SEC's investigation of China-based issuers and their auditors NASDAQ's proposed new listing requirements for reverse merger companies SEC's Investor Bulletin on reverse merger companies Moody's "Red Flags" report on China-based companies D&O insurance coverage issues for claims against… [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm by The Legal Blog
"(2)"An acknowledgement of a Deed, or Speciality, by writing or part payment or part satisfaction (Civil Procedure Act, 1833 (c. 42), Section 5 will suffice if it contains a clear admission of the speciality debt (see Moodie v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
 In particular, she believes the Legislature should expand the right to counsel to include habeas writs, only for purposes of challenging ineffective assistance claims.Grits would add that the Legislature should consider a remedy to the issues raised by the US Supreme Court's decision in Davila v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm by Jana Grauberger and Stephen Wiegand
  However, the proposed regulations specify the method BSEE will use to enforce accrued decommissioning obligations against “predecessors. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Professor Kopel one coauthor a law review article with Professor Moody, and presented an empirical study by Moody in an amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) and Family Court Act § 413 (1) were amended by Laws of 2011, Ch 436 to correct these anomalies and to codify the decision in Rose v Moody. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
So… after Apollo Management acquired WMC, they started adding value primarily by mandating the liberal use of GE-inspired-jargon and redecorating their offices with Six-Sigma-drapes and other window dressings, purchased after a three-hour presentation using a 450 slide deck of Power Point slides… with a corroborating opinion from McKinsey, of course. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
The Chief Justice holds (¶46) that the words “this aspect” indicate that the majority’s agreement with Reddy J. was confined to the use of “tax evasion through the use of colourable devices”. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
“[T]he use of a two-day window is inappropriate to measure price impact in an efficient market. [read post]