Search for: "MacMillan v. MacMillan"
Results 221 - 240
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2009, 7:38 am
” The case is Kinses v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 8:26 pm
Wood, [1927] 1 W.W.R. 580 (B.C.S.C.), considered in MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 9:33 pm
MacMillan Bloedel (Saskatchewan) Ltd., (1981) 56 CPR (2d) 145 (S.C.C.)). [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:44 pm
MacMillan [2003] B.C.J. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:33 am
Summary of Decision issued April 2, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Robinson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:00 am
Lusignan, The Clause Less Taken: Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:43 am
Summary of Decision issued February 19, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Cook v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
Hale ; associate editors, Gail V. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 7:46 am
Trus Joist MacMillan, 22 F.3d 1059 (11th Cir.1994); Brown v. [read post]
Will Teamsters' Supreme Court of Canada Employment Law Victory Erode Employee Rights on Termination?
5 May 2008, 3:30 pm
Evans v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:40 am
Justice Parrett in Harris v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:35 pm
A superb study of the conference is Margaret MacMillan's Paris 1919.... 1943, U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:22 am
Flentye v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:24 am
See, Scherer v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:27 am
Gregory Weisz of Pence and MacMillan, Laramie, Wyoming. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 8:20 am
Rupture factor: substantial - this book is heavier than it looks.Also in the field of copyright, but definitely not a reference work for practitioners, is New Directions In Copyright Law, Volume 4, the latest in the series of excellent collections of essays edited by Birkbeck, University of London law professor Fiona Macmillan. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 8:47 am
Lessig's post starts out: Engaget reports that "the head honcho of Macmillan Publishers" lifted a couple Google laptops at a recent BookExpo America, and then when he returned them, retorted "hope you enjoyed a taste of your own medicine," and "there wasn't a sign by the computers informing him not to steal them. [read post]
11 May 2007, 8:38 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Plymale f/k/a Donnelly v. [read post]
