Search for: "Macy v. Macy"
Results 221 - 240
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2016, 10:10 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 pm
Men have it easy compared to women: they don’t have to ponder the great Pantsuit v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court ruling addressing the EEOC’s interpretation, set forth in Macy, of Title VII as to the extent of coverage afforded to transgender workers by the sex stereotyping theory. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 6:03 pm
The defendant in the recent case of People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:24 am
Macy's - $26.24 Gosh, I love this color. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 6:03 pm
The defendant in the recent case of People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Amelio 141,167 127,500 765 4,884 274,316 Reuben V. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
A few years back in Georgia v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:57 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that found former members of the landmark Dukes v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:13 am
In Telsaint v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
Macy Petty is a pro-life activist who was falsely portrayed as crying outside of the Supreme Court after its overturning of Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:16 pm
Brown v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 8:49 am
The EEOC Guidance specifically refers to two cases addressing discrimination on the basis of gender identity, both of which offer direction for employers: In Macy v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm
Penney, Kohl’s, Macy’s, and Sears for violating California’s Unfair Competition law, Cal. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Macy’s, Inc., No. 1:07-CV-00828, 2008 U.S. [read post]
