Search for: "Maine v. Taylor"
Results 221 - 240
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2021, 1:08 pm
There were two main issues. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:49 am
, with his gift to landlords all, the case of Spencer v Taylor ably covered by Tessa earlier this week so I wont labour the point here. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
Taylor Alumni Professor of Business Law at Cornell Law School. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:21 am
For years the main reason for this was the section 21 advantage. [read post]
28 May 2011, 2:04 pm
The case IWOI, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:31 pm
For example, one of my favorite challengers - unapologetic free trade Republican Jason Levesque up in Maine - lost to the House's top protectionist, Mike Michaud. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:58 pm
Supreme Court held in a 1976 case, Castaneda v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Eirby, No. 07-1062 "A conviction for violating a Maine statute, which makes it a crime for a person to "engage[] in a sexual act with another person, not the actor's spouse, who is either 14 or 15 years of age and the actor...is at least 10 years older than the other person," 17-A M.R.S.A. section 254(1)(A-2), is a crime of violence for sentencing purposes. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
St Marylebone Property Co [1962] 2 WLR 1020 : [1962] 2 All ER 288 can be considered where House of Lords referring to Taylor v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
Affected individuals generally suffer from loss of appetite, so the main concern is ensuring a patient receives adequate nutrition and avoids permanent liver damage (Mayo Clinic, 2009). [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Most recently and notably, in 2020, in Kelly v. [read post]
Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm
”[4] [1] Hay v African Gold Recovery Co 1902 TS 232 p 233. [2] University of Southampton’s Applications [2006] RPC 567 (CA) paras 22–25. [3] Bertie Van Zyl (Pty) Ltd v Minister for Safety and Security 2010 (2) SA 181 (CC) para 21. [4] Josh Taylor, “I’m sorry Dave I’m afraid I invented that: Australian court finds AI systems can be recognised under patent law,” The Guardian (July 30, 2021)… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Factual and Procedural Background The main facts of the case have been known for some time (and are detailed and periodically updated in a Just Security chronology). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
A recent example of this followed the Hillsborough disaster and the Taylor report which examined it. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:23 am
But we have also contended, with respect to the main defendant so far, Twitter, that “Twitter's defenses are probably strong, there being no particular reason in the complaint[s] themselves to connect the specific attack[s] with anything that happened on Twitter. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
In United Steelworkers Local 2251 v Algoma Steel Inc., in an arbitration of a dual Canadian-American citizen working in Canada, but living on the American border. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:42 am
(See also the CLS case, and the famous Mozert v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
