Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 221 - 240
of 709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:41 am
Children are inherently seen to be more vulnerable than adults, and as such the Secretary of State has “historically adopted different, more favourable policies in relation to asylum seekers who are under 18“. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
—Mahatma Gandhi 1Lloyd’s America v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 6:07 am
What was the main rationale for the order? [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
Cuttic v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Maine’s secretary of state ruled in December that Trump should be taken off the primary ballot there, and challenges to Trump’s eligibility are currently pending in 11 other states. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm
He was recently elected Secretary of the 39,000 member State Bar of Georgia. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:30 am
Cal. 1974) (“a financial statement filed with the California Secretary of State”); In re Tamis, 398 B.R. 124, 126 (Bankr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm
Update-1: On Jan. 23, 2025, responding to State of Washington et al v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm
Wisconsin, about whether a state law authorizing a blood draw from an unconscious motorist requires a warrant; and Rehaif v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
In Chae v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
However, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, intervening, mounted a full scale opposition to the 'right to accommodation' being a civil right for Art 6(1) purposes, on the basis that this would have wide ramifications for administrative practice in many area, not just homeless decisions. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
However, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, intervening, mounted a full scale opposition to the 'right to accommodation' being a civil right for Art 6(1) purposes, on the basis that this would have wide ramifications for administrative practice in many area, not just homeless decisions. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
As the government concedes, the Secretary of State, who, under18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:53 pm
But the secs. of state for Maine, Michigan and Nebraska decided the other way. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am
” Fanning v. [read post]
