Search for: "Major C. Davis" Results 221 - 240 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2022, 8:04 am by Jim Sedor
The GOP’s narrow majority will make governing nearly impossible and make the next battle for the House in 2024 a toss-up. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Sanitation can also be a major problem during the production of Mexican-style soft cheeses such as queso fresco (Figure 1c). [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
C & B Flooring Associates, LLC (29-CA-24357; 349 NLRB No. 66) Albertson, NY March 30, 2007. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
Gary Davis from Ireland, perhaps a tad controversially for a data protection deputy commissioner, noted that there seemed to be emerging agreement on trading personal data for free web 2.0 services, but the question was, how much data was too much data; and Bruce Schneier (no link needed!) [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:46 pm by David Lat
For information on how to apply, check out the S&C website. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm by Haley Proctor
Professor Davis profiled a similar Order No. 1000 challenge—incidentally, also captioned LSP Transmission Holdings II v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:50 am
Weil Gotshal's Lori Fife, 12/5/08 Sullivan & Cromwell's Frank Aquila, 11/21/08 Verizon's John Thorne, 11/7/08 George Kahale and Eric Gilioli of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, 10/31/08 Gilbert + Tobin's Gina Cass-Gottlieb, 10/24/08 Davis Polk's Diane Kerr, 10/17/08 Slaughter and May's Nigel Boardman,10/10/08 S&C's Mitchell Eitel,10/3/08 Munger Tolles's Robert Denham,9/26/08 S&C's H. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Jonathan Holbrook
She agreed with the majority that the instruction regarding the garden hoe was error warranting a new trial. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am by Wolfgang Demino
., Appellees.No. 04-15-00469-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio.Delivered and Filed: July 27, 2016.DISSENTING OPINIONREBECA C. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 12:56 pm by John Floyd
Morgan Meyer (R-Dallas) introduced House Bill 2789 that would make it a Class C misdemeanor (subject to a $500 fine) to electronically transmit unwanted sexually explicit material. [read post]