Search for: "Major v. Social Security Administration"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2018, 10:57 am
The current one can be regarded as the “perfect storm” because it directly affects consumers and it is in the area of social media, which currently attracts major attention from both privacy regulators and consumers. [read post]
26 May 2008, 11:29 pm
An administrative hearing was held to determine the validity of Siepierski's claim. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am
A curated weekday guide to major national security news and developments over the past 24 hours. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
15 Administrability: Information asymmetries between enforcers and market participants can be especially stark in the digital economy. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:45 am
In Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:26 pm
V. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
Because the State Department performs both administrative and law enforcement functions, the Court ‘scrutinized with some skepticism the particular purpose claimed for disputed documents. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:01 am
Simply because the Social Security Administration has determined that a person is disabled does not necessarily mean that the person is incapable of performing everyday tasks. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm
Specifically, it invokes the "major questions" doctrine – outlined by Justice Neil Gorsuch in dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:10 am
The court held in Ben Meir v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:54 am
Different Approaches to Regulating AI Outputs AI regulation is a hot topic in Washington as legislators from both parties and the Biden administration seek to make their mark in an emerging area of law. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:36 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Their political background, social condition, culture and the availability of alternative legislations to deal with seditious situations to safeguard their national security are different to those in HKSAR. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 11:26 am
The Gresham v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
Reply Brief Filed in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
After West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:03 am
Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that on Friday “the administration asked the justices to allow it to enforce the Migrant Protection Protocols, also known as the ‘remain in Mexico’ policy, which allows the Department of Homeland Security to return immigrants to Mexico while they wait for deportation proceedings. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
At least, given Roberts’ King v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am
In reality, on February 12, 2014, the Obama Administration, through the National Institute of Standards (NIST), announced the NIST Cyber Security Framework to “allow organizations – regardless of size, degree of cyber risk or cybersecurity sophistication – to apply the principles and best practices of risk management to improve the security and resilience of critical infrastructure. [read post]
