Search for: "Majors v. US Air, Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Anthony B. Cavender
However, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District issued NSR rules that affected all new and modified sources of air pollution, whether major or minor, and they were made a part of the California SIP. [read post]
11 May 2017, 9:17 am by Joe Koncelik
 Such provisions are included in the Clean Air Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Clean Water Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
  Again the Harriscourt refused to follow Ramirez, opting instead to apply the analysis used in Caplinger v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm by Joe Koncelik
EPA's major rulemaking efforts were consolidated into a single appeal- Coalition for Responsible Regulation Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am by Michael Livermore
In other words, for Kavanaugh, cost considerations were a one-way ratchet: When costs are high, then they can be used to justify less stringent environmental protection, but cheap and easy controls are not a good reason to go further to clean up the air. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog)   [read post]