Search for: "Mark v. Mark" Results 221 - 240 of 34,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am by Hannah Catt
He used a case study from one of his successful cases, Oklahoma Genetics Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:33 am by Nedim Malovic
According to case law, applicants typically face difficulties in demonstrating the inherent distinctiveness of non-conventional trade marks and this is testified by the fact that most cases pertaining to non-conventional trade marks, spanning from 2021 to 2024, deal with the issue of inherent distinctiveness.The significant departure test for distinctivenessFor a trade mark to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods in respect of which… [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:46 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Waiver of jury trial — On-the-record examination Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Somerset County, Mark Russell, appellant, was convicted of sexual solicitation of a minor. [read post]
7 May 2019, 1:23 pm by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Motor torts — Contributory negligence On Memorial Day in 2015, Margaret Fleishell, the appellant, and Mark Howard, the appellee, were involved in a T-bone collision in an intersection near Denton, Maryland. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:10 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Habeas corpus petition — Sentencing by state for federal offense In this case, Mark Lomax, appellant, appeals from the denial of a petition for habeas corpus he filed in the Circuit Court for Allegany County. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:26 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
"In light of the not uncommon practice of lawyers to argue inconsistent theories, we cannot say that the decision of Dekoria Marks's trial lawyer to argue them here deprived her of the right to constitutionally effective assistance, irrespective of whether we or the [...] [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
Moreover, national law can only provide relief in respect of acts performed on the national territory in question (CJEU, IHT Internationale Heiztechnik v Ideal-Standard, case C-9/93, at para. 22). 3. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:11 am by Ted Frank
”) Tags: Mark Lanier Related posts WSJ: “Lanier Seeks to Repeat Courtroom Success” (0) Vioxx: Mark Lanier’s smears of the Ernst v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 9:08 am by sam
The Court […] The post <i>DivX LLC v Hulu LLC</i> – Patent marking can impact damages. appeared first on Staas & Halsey LLP. [read post]