Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 221 - 240
of 34,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., LP v Service Empls. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., LP v Service Empls. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
In Bradford v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:23 pm
For example, he praises Obergefell v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Dist., 28 NY3d 455, 461 [2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Dist., 28 NY3d 455, 461 [2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:30 am
UBANK (TN) v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:19 am
” Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Burke, P.C., 187 AD3d 503, 503 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:47 am
In Pulsifer v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
IOEngine, LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:38 am
See Muldrow v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:04 am
The owners of famous or iconic marks who may have experienced, due to market conditions outside of their control, a downturn in sales might still have a reputation even if it has not been in use for a couple of years.Marcel Pemsel considered the recent General Court judgment on the refusal to register the trade mark 'Pablo Escobar' (T-255/23). [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:55 am
Indeed, it is impossible to understand last Term’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]