Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
IPKat reductions are available for those readers who wish to attend. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
S. ___, ___ (2021) (per curiam) (slip op., at 6) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 May 2009, 7:03 am
As always, I wish you the very best. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 2:16 am
Today we passed the 2 million visitor mark. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
Many congratulations to everyone who was promoted this year - the IPKat team wish you every success (unless you are ever against the AmeriKat, of course)! [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
" Krefter v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:18 am
This blog post will not focus on the decision itself (though other Kats may wish to comment on it). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:36 am
I just wish the court would explain more clearly this new way of considering standard character marks.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:16 pm
[Last week's argument at the Supreme Court in 303 Creative v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Merpel pays a brief visit to EponiaMerpel has been rather busy of late, but does not wish her dear readers to think that she is completely oblivious to the events that have been taking place in Eponia. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:18 am
Any organization wishing to apply for permanent observer status should submit a request to the WIPO Secretariat. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:53 am
By Mark S. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
Palomer’s story at oral argument, but I wish to tell you his story today. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:16 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
” Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
