Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 221 - 240
of 12,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 9:27 am
ART v OHIM (C-171/06 P): It is necessary, in any event, to reject T.I.M.E. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
When asked what good he’s done with his show, Mr. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
The new statute amended certain sections of the Trademark Act 1965, and defines a trade mark to include a mark used in relation to goods or services for the purpose of indicating a connection between the goods or services, and may include the shape of goods, their packaging, and combination of colours; and be used in relation to a certification trademark, registered or deemed to have been registered under the Act.Africa map with ethnic motif patternMarch:… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:36 am
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm
The words in the Pledge marked me as an outsider. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:11 am
The Wet Seal, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:21 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
Following the Jack Daniel’s decision, to resolve whether the Rogers test applies, the Second Circuit had to determine if MSCHF used Vans’ marks as a mark for its own goods. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:22 am
This week marks the publication of a book by the IPKat’s Dutch friend and former GuestKat Léon Dijkman on the hotly contested notion of the proportionality test in European patent law, accessible for free here. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm
Recently, during the oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
“Plaintiff does not allege that any of the products that purportedly contain false advertising use its marks “Planet Green” or “Doorstepink. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:26 pm
See Vans, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:30 am
Urban Dollz LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm
Under Terry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
See Knoll’s use of its registered mark “Knoll Studio” (Reg. # 1821382) on leg of Barcelona Chair, pictured right. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
It’s a good book, but I only counted 982,343 cats. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
However, the assessment of the inherent distinctive character of a sign must be made only by reference to the goods and services and the perception of the sign in question (Henkel v OHIM, C-456/01 P at para. 35). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
Sandpiper Real Estate Fund 4 Limited Partnership v. [read post]
