Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 221 - 240
of 14,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2010, 3:03 am
Further, there is no evidence as to how the mark was used by Network. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm
Amy Howe cover the ruling for this blog; her coverage first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:29 pm
” The post Afternoon round-up: Oral argument in <em>Department of Commerce v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
If so, how much freedom of variation is possible? [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:15 am
"Applicant pointed to Red Carpet Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
Citigroup Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
The last two contributions have focused on the first question referred to the CJEU which concerns how to prove acquired distinctiveness in shape marks. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:15 pm
Amy Howe has this blog’s analysis, which was first published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 7:13 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 1:51 pm
Background on Booking.com B.V. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
Alas, Brigadier General Mark Martins, now the chief prosecutor of the military commissions, can’t blog for Lawfare any more, as he did when he was in the field in Afghanistan. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
The rule laid out in Marks v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:18 am
Retail Royalty Company v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 3:49 am
Nfinity IP, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:45 am
How do you think this came out? [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 11:26 am
Diamond Dallas Page v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The General Court gives lipstick shape mark a French kissGuerlain v EUIPO Case T-488/20 EU General Court (July 2021) Shape marks haven’t fared well in Retromark coverage over the years. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
In a recent Monroe County decision in the case of Smith v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd [2015] EWHC 1773 (IPEC), a 29 June decision of Judge Richard Hacon in the increasingly impressive and cost-effective Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, is impressive not only in its length (123 paragraphs) but also for the fact that the court was able to deal with so many legal and evidential issues in just two hearing days. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
