Search for: "Marks v. USA"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Thus, the judgment on the trademark infringement and false advertising claims were reversed and the case remanded (Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:54 am
Sti. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm
Department of Education (USDA) to consider issuing (i) new rules under the Packers and Stockyards Act making it easier for farmers to bring and win claims, stopping chicken processors from exploiting and underpaying chicken farmers, and adopting anti-retaliation protections for farmers who speak out about bad practices; (ii) new rules defining when meat can bear “Product of USA” labels, so that consumers have accurate, transparent labels that enable them to choose products made… [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 8:29 am
(citing B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 3:38 am
Sunpoint International Group USA Corp., 2021 U.S.P.Q.2d 785 (TTAB 2021) [precedential]. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Cybersecurity Attacks: Regulatory and Practical Approach Towards Preventing Data Breach and Cyber-Attacks in USA, Seth Azubuike, Northeastern University, School of Law; Boston Bar Association; IAPP. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 7:52 am
” John Fritze of USA Today reports that “Mississippi asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 8:27 am
Interesting pending civil action in Grupo Bimbo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
The Court confronted this directly in Hill v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 11:05 am
Applicant claims that in Matal v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
Here, Meenaxi asserted that it is the prior user of the marks in the USA. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
Turning Point USA at Ark. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 [2014]), and requires a showing of “egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of the defendant attorneys” (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; Wailes v Tel Networks USA, LLC, 116 AD3d 625, 625-626 [2014]). [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:15 am
Dodge has a post titled “The Surprisingly Broad Implications of Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
AWP USA Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in PGA Tour v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
