Search for: "Marriage of Olson"
Results 221 - 240
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Fast forward to the Boies/Olson strategy of only suing two county Clerks. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:47 am
Ted Olson argues for the plaintiffs on the merits, starting off by noting that the Supreme Court has never defined marriage as between a man and a woman (though this could be the case where they are asked to). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:51 pm
Judges Hawkins and Reinhardt, especially, kept encouraging Ted Olson to take a big — but incomplete — victory, declaring Prop 8 to be unconstitutional, but avoiding the deeper question of whether the state can ever deprive its gay and lesbian citizens of the right to marry. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
Judge Reinhardt pressed Olson to say whether the Circuit Court, in order to strike down the marriage ban, had to declare that there was a constitutional right to gay marriage. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:12 am
Today's broadcast of NPR's "Morning Edition" contained audio segments entitled "Ted Olson, Gay Marriage's Unlikely Legal Warrior" (featuring Nina Totenberg) and "In Calif., Prop. 8 Debate Tests Limits Of Tolerance. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm
“I don’t think Ted Olson is a conservative,” says Brian Brown, executive director of the National Organization for Marriage. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
The first post does a fabulous job of discussing the key players and events that led to this pivotal moment in the struggle for same-sex marriage. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
“I understand their frustration,” Olson told me recently. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 4:36 pm
Whoa — Ted Olson chatting with Justice Samuel Alito! [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm
We’ve actually got Republicans like Ted Olson and even Ken Mehlman on our side now. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
However, keeping in line with the theme of surprise this week, Olson also joined forces with his opposing counsel in Bush v Gore, David Boies, to bring and win a federal suit to overturn Prop 8 banning gay marriage in California in Perry v Schwarzenegger.A few weeks ago, Google submitted a motion to the 2nd Circuit court to consolidate the appeals of Viacom and the class action suit headed by the Premier League. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:46 am
Bush administration solicitor general Ted Olson, who is leading the legal challenge of California's ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:24 am
In a sense, all Congress is doing is anointing this marriage of convenience between two major industry groups. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:53 am
Also, I do not think that Ted Olson would take on a case of this magnitude — particularly one that goes against his usual ideological proclivities (though see his Newsweek article) — unless he knew there was a high likelihood of a payoff awaiting him at the end. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:00 am
I thought this was an interesting contrast to Boies and Olson’s decision to fight the stay of Perry at each stage. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:47 am
The unreported opinion adds details to this sad tale, sisters tight for 70 years, through marriage, illness, and all, turning bitter when they couldn’t agree on whether Rose had loaned Terry $250 or $100, and over whether Terry had any money to repay her. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm
Analysis From the moment nearly 15 months ago that two master legal tacticians, David Boies and Theodore Olson, launched the case of Perry v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 11:10 pm
" The reason Boies and Ted Olson won the Prop 8 case at trial was because their side had numerous empirical studies and other evidence showing that gay marriage has no harmful effects on society. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:53 am
"The conservative defense of marriage is utterly unconvincing" http://j.mp/9eF7Uo linda hirshman explains why "The conservative defense of marriage is utterly unconvincing" http://j.mp/aUiCDp wall street journal law blog on "‘Girls’ vs. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:11 pm
That miffedness may have also extended to the fact that Olson and Boies argued for heightened scrutiny, but if so, it seems misplaced. [read post]
