Search for: "Marshall v. Peter"
Results 221 - 240
of 284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2010, 3:05 am
” State Supreme Court Judge Peter M. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and to Chief Judge Spottswood Robinson of the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:34 pm
These include an award of Aus$268,000 (£160,000) to a surgeon for a “breast job libel” (Haertsch v Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 182) and an award totalling Aus$615,000 (£370,000) for multiple libels to two plaintiffs (Megna v Marshall [2010] NSWSC 686). [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm
The latest (v. 35 no. 2) issue of the Journal of Supreme Court History has another article on Justice Harlan, albeit one in a very light vein. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Howe Chemical Co., Inc., 210 AD2d 62 [1st Dept 1994]; see also Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9 [1974]; Marshall v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Searle v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:21 pm
The blog is devoted to reporting and commenting on developments related to Crawford v. [read post]
What's so bad about "business method" patents? Small PR firms "goosed" by a patent on press releases
21 Jul 2010, 5:52 pm
As Peter Brann, the author of that brief, put it, those suits often boil down to an assertion of "we own a patent, you operate a website. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:15 pm
For example, the American system of forensic proof has the following striking features (among others): (i) extensive pretrial and prelitigation gathering, marshaling, and preparation of evidence; (ii) the gathering and submission of large quantities of small slivers of evidence; (iii) party domination of pretrial and trial evidentiary processes; (iv) extensive argument about evidence; and (v) the use of stories in argument about evidence. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions After a number of hearings going back to February 2008, Simpson J in New South Wales gave a 743 paragraph judgment in the case Michael Megna & Russell Lloyd v David Marshall & Richard Tory [2010] NSWSC 686. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
For example, in the Peters v Kiff decision, he recognized the importance of the right to trial by jury when he held that a white criminal defendant could challenge the exclusion of black jurors. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Fishburne thanked the attorneys present “for continuing to ‘use the law the way Marshall teaches us. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
” The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:59 am
V. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” In news unrelated to the nomination, coverage of Monday’s seven decisions and five cert. grants has not petered out. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:58 am
John Marshall Harlan is still making the news. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Marshall discussed the sale of genuine goods with the barcoded data removed constituted a trade mark infringement in the US, reviewing Davidoff's successful COOL WATER action against CVS (here) and the bizarre manner of its expression.Dr Peter Ruess (International School of Management, Frankfurt) then examined the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Court C-57/08 COPAD v Dior. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Brown, University of Maryland, “Incommensurable Subjects: Patriots, Traitors, and the African American Literary Tradition”Courtney Marshall, University of New Hampshire, “Law, Literature, and the Construction of a Black Female Subject: Zora Neale Hurston as Legal Storyteller”Kevin Maillard, Syracuse University College of Law, “A Preposterous Story: Interracial Pretext in Faulkner and Chesnutt” Panel 4: Literature, Law, and Genre/Form, Rm. [read post]
