Search for: "Martin v. Doe et al"
Results 221 - 240
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
MCNEIL, et al. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Martin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Oliver et al (2008) published a comprehensive review of developments and future outlooks for pre-harvest food safety this month. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (IAM), (Patent Circle), India takes open source approach to drug discovery: (Patent Lens), India: Indian Bayh Dole Bill: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Does India need Bayh-Dole? [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four strategic choices:… [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 11:50 pm
In Now there you go again, LBE wroteStrandburg et al. [21 Berkeley Tech. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
MASON et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:02 am
Martin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Allen, et aL, Nos. 2:06-cv-695-WKW, 2:06-cv-WKW, 2007 WL 4463489, Mem. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 1:23 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., et al., No. 07-60399 (5th Cir. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 1:23 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., et al., No. 07-60399 (5th Cir. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Geeklawyer, an IP lawyer, does manage to slip in a bit of law from time to time - but, mercifully, his blawg provides, for me, other attractions. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:45 am
Robert Brennan et al. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:55 am
Shi V. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
We hold that plaintiffs have not shown the requisite culpability, and AFFIRM the district court's ruling. 07a0473p.06 Richardson, et al v. [read post]
