Search for: "Mathie v. Mathie"
Results 221 - 240
of 280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
March 2011 Law Library Acquisitions ListAfricaKQC772 .K5 2010Statutory recognition of customary land rights in Africa : an investigation into best practices for lawmaking and implementation / by Rachael S. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Zinman v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
Cir. 2009) (affirming an award of attorney fees where a party made "multiple, repeated misrepresentations" to the court (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)); Mathis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
Probationary employee challenging his or her termination must show bad faith or an improper or impermissible reason underlies the terminationMatter of Mathis v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2011 NY Slip Op 01190, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentProbationary correction officer Demar Mathis filed an Article 78 petition challenging his termination from his employment for “failure to complete his probationary period in a satisfactory manner. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
Ferrer for the Southern District of Florida; Special Agent in Charge John V. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 am
When Miranda was still new, Mathis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:30 am
The Court’s ruling on the case — expected in its next Term — will clarify the scope of the Court’s ruling in 1968 in Mathis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:38 am
Mathis v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
Div. 2000) (settlement with one defendant did not preclude allocation of fault in an action against another defendant); Mathis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:26 am
Mathis, 2010 U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:26 pm
” [via LexisOne] Milton Wunzael Mathi v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:02 am
Today, the Court issued an opinion in Fields v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:53 pm
Mathis, No.1:10-CR-260 in the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm
It mirrors the “reprehensibility” factor described by the United States Supreme Court in BMW of North American, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 am
Thanks for reading, Bianca V. [read post]
