Search for: "Matter of Cruz v Cruz"
Results 221 - 240
of 392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Laura Cruz v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Laura Cruz v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Laura Cruz v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
There I argued (among other things) that the amicus brief of Senators Hawley, Cruz, and Lee is peculiar in that it is almost entirely directed against the undue burden test adopted by SCOTUS in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:03 pm
Whitney V. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 3:11 pm
A similar holding is in a case issued just yesterday, Cruz v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
Second, Texas Senator Ted Cruz has already issued a press release denouncing this ruling. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 5:39 pm
Hartigan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
For the County of San Mateo, the County of Marin, the City of Imperial Beach, the City and County of Santa Cruz, and the City of Richmond, the district court found that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
For the County of San Mateo, the County of Marin, the City of Imperial Beach, the City and County of Santa Cruz, and the City of Richmond, the district court found that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm
Even the Supreme Court prefers to treat Bush v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:49 pm
” Not only opposed to Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hansen Knick v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
City of Monterey Park(2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 394: A measure placed on local ballot by city council providing for competitive bidding for trash hauling was not subject to CEQA because it was a matter pertaining to government funding under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4). [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 10:01 pm
In Swearingen v. [read post]
