Search for: "Matter of Dept. of Insurance's Order"
Results 221 - 240
of 434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
Thus, Supreme Court's order dismissing the action must be vacated (see e.g. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
In addition, it ordered defendant to maintain health insurance for the minor child until he reached the age of 21, ordering the parties to share the cost of unreimbursed medical expenses with the defendant paying 57% of such costs. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:21 am
Dept. of Insurance, HRICI, WorldAtWork, CLE & Other Continuing Education Credit These programs are approved to be offered for general certification credit by the Texas Department of Insurance, HRCI and WorldAtWork education credit for the time period offered subject to fulfillment all applicable accrediting agency requirements, completion of required procedures and payment of the additional service processing fee of $10.00. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In this case, though, it did not matter. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
American Transit Insurance Company, 280 AD2d 328 [1st Dept. 2001]; Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
App.Div. 4th Dept. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Daniels Agency, Inc.), 118 AD2d 646 (2d Dept 1986). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Daniels Agency, Inc.), 118 AD2d 646 (2d Dept 1986). [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
See, Matter of Elianne M., 196 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dept., 1993). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:05 am
In Tishman v Bogatin,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1392995 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which directed defendant to pay 40% of the cost of the parties' older child's college education. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
In Matter of Lamarcus E.,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1211389 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Defendant appealed from the July 2011 order. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
Thus, Supreme Court's order dismissing the action must be vacated (see e.g. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am
Child Support Cap Raised from $130,000 to $136,000 The "combined parental income amount" to be utilized in calculating child support orders has increased from $130,000 to $136,000 effective January 31, 2012. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:31 pm
Co., 17 AD3d 280 (1st Dept. 2005) [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
In Matter of Malek v Kwiatkowski, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5984260 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
" The rule goes on to state that, if the pretrial conference is set up without any court order regarding the attendance of an insurance representative with settlement authority, such a person is still required by the terms of the rule to attend the conference in person "or be promptly available by phone. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
Order of Protection Properly Denied Where Communications Sent with Legitimate Purpose of Attempting to Reconcile with Petitioner In Ovsanik v Ovsanik, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5433772 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) the Appellate Divison reversed an order of protection granted by the Family Court finding that Petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed acts constituting a family offense. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
Order of Protection Properly Denied Where Communications Sent with Legitimate Purpose of Attempting to Reconcile with Petitioner In Ovsanik v Ovsanik, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5433772 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) the Appellate Divison reversed an order of protection granted by the Family Court finding that Petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed acts constituting a family offense. [read post]
What Consitutes Prejudice to a Liability Insurer? A Default Judgment Taken Against its Insured Does.
11 Nov 2011, 7:13 am
Co. (2nd Dept., decided 11/1/2011) Under certain types of New York liability insurance policies issued, renewed or modified on and after January 17, 2009, an insured's late notice of an accident or occurrence or of a related lawsuit must prejudice the insurer before it may decline coverage based on the late notice. [read post]
