Search for: "Matter of English v Smith"
Results 221 - 240
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
Mr Justice Smith, hearing the matter initially, dismissed the application on the grounds that a stay of the kind applied for should be granted only in rare and compelling circumstances, which were not present in this case. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:19 pm
Smith). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
But statistically, that doesn’t matter. [read post]
Case Comment: Petroleo Brasileiro S.A (Respondent) v E.N.E. Kos 1 Limited (Appellant) [2012] UKSC 17
6 Aug 2012, 2:34 am
Gaudet v Brown (1873) and Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield (1874). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:47 am
However, by a majority (Dame Janet Smith dissenting) the Court held that the claimant could not rely on the FAA because the head of damage under German law, the loss of the right to maintenance, did not correspond to compensation for loss of dependency, the head of damage under English law. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:36 am
For a patentable subject matter issue, the document might be Mayo v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
The UK Human Rights blog reports: Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
There may be Bivens (Bivens v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
Lord Denning Jarvis v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
A detailed analysis by Graham Smith is available here. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
’ Graham Smith, writing on his Cyberleagle blog, provides a detailed run-down of the implications for internet publication. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
Smith, the defendant had appealed, arguing in part that the trial judge had failed to so advise him. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
There are already a number of pieces on the subject matter, with some of the most interesting ones featuring in the UKCLG Blog and the UKSC Blog. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am
NPR’s Carrie Johnson discusses prosecutorial misconduct and Brady obligations in the wake of the Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
