Search for: "Matter of Jonathan H."
Results 221 - 240
of 856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
Notable Cast: Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington, and Jason Robards.Director: Jonathan DemmeYear: 1992IMDB Rating: 7.6/10Memorable Quote: “What I love the most about the law? [read post]
10 May 2021, 1:55 pm
Panelists Michelle Ye Hee Lee, reporter at the Washington Post and president of the Asian American Journalists Association; Jonathan Corpus Ong, associate professor of global digital media at the University of Massachusetts Amherst; Rui Zhong, program associate at the Wilson Center’s Kissinger Institute on China will join moderator Jean H. [read post]
10 May 2021, 5:46 am
But partisanship is how we got here: Everyone knows that a justice's legal philosophy matters enormously in the way cases are decided. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
Writing in dissent, Justice Kavanaugh argues that the majority's interpretation is "perplexing as a matter of statutory interpretation and common sense. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:36 am
" While there may be strong arguments for deferential review of agency scientific determinations as a general matter, there are reasons to question such deference when agency action implicates constitutional matters. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:19 pm
Instead, what matters is that the jury had the opportunity to decide for itself whether to believe Blackwell. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
Richard H. [read post]
[Jonathan H. Adler] Is SCOTUS Getting Ready to Reverse the Sixth Circuit in a Habeas Case Yet Again?
5 Apr 2021, 7:20 am
In other words, a clear majority of the Sixth Circuit concluded the panel was wrong as a matter of law, but only seven sought en banc review. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:40 am
Whatever one makes of this argument as a policy matter, I find Siri's arguments wholly unconvincing as a legal matter, and I am not alone. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:39 am
All that mattered was whether the Tennessee court, notwithstanding its substantial "latitude to reasonably determine that a defendant has not [shown prejudice]," still managed to blunder so badly that every fairminded jurist would disagree. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:41 am
While one cannot draw any broad conclusions about the Court from just two decisions, it is interesting that, despite the distinct subject matter in each case, the Chief Justice and Justice Kavanaugh aligned fully with the Court's liberal justices, separating from the Court's other conservatives in their analysis, if not also the result. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm
By comparison, British Columbia was able to implement an economy-wide carbon tax in a matter of months. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:52 pm
Domestic Politics and the Turnover Trap Cassilde Schwartz, Miranda Simon, David Hudson, & Shane D Johnson, Law Breaking and Law Bending: How International Migrants Negotiate with State Borders Michal Parizek & Matthew D Stephen, The Increasing Representativeness of International Organizations’ Secretariats: Evidence from the United Nations System, 1997–2015 Jillienne Haglund & Ryan M Welch, From Litigation to Rights: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights Hanne… [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:12 am
Cir. 2007), citing H. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:48 pm
(Update: No)–5/5/20 The Penalty-less Individual Mandate Is Severable from the Rest of the ACA No Matter How You Look at It. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 7:40 am
Part of the reason that principles matter in politics is that once a line is crossed, even just a little, it becomes successively easier to cross it again. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
Rev. 689 (1991), Jonathan L. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 7:31 am
It is common for a justice's first majority opinion to involve a relatively minor matter. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
Jonathan Entin, David F. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 7:41 pm
In City Journal, Mark Mills writes: Peter Huber, a long-time senior fellow of the Manhattan Institute, a founding partner in a successful Washington, D.C. law firm; a polymath and prolific author of a dozen consequential books and hundreds of essays and op-eds; influential analyst, intellectual powerhouse, and seer in matters from the role of science in the courts, to telecom competition and environmental regulation, as well as energy and health-care policy—all issues of as… [read post]
