Search for: "Matter of Kagan" Results 221 - 240 of 2,781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2022, 2:16 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The meaning of the word “prohibited” in section 107 of the restoration act matters a great deal to this case. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
First Amendment Cases Chemerinsky – No matter what else the Supreme Court decides this year, Citizens Unitedwill be the most important decision of the 2009 Term. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:03 pm
They are the liberal wing of the Court, so it's just a matter of whether or not Justice Breyer joins them. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:33 am by Kent Scheidegger
.* and 1-5 are unchanged, as are 8, 10, 11, and Fed.Justice Kagan previously had the Sixth and Seventh, from Tennessee to Wisconsin. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:30 am by Richard Pildes
  If it preclears the plan, that’s the end of the matter. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
This means that almost anything that fits that criteria could therefore be rejected by the USPTO.The Court honed matters down further, noting that the provision aims to suppress certain views, albeit 'immoral' ones, and would violate free speech., even if allegedly captured through the use of "viewpoint-neutral" legislative language.Justice Kagan wrapped matters up by drawing a line in the sand: "There are a great many immoral and scandalous ideas… [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
This means that almost anything that fits that criteria could therefore be rejected by the USPTO.The Court honed matters down further, noting that the provision aims to suppress certain views, albeit 'immoral' ones, and would violate free speech., even if allegedly captured through the use of "viewpoint-neutral" legislative language.Justice Kagan wrapped matters up by drawing a line in the sand: "There are a great many immoral and scandalous ideas… [read post]
23 May 2009, 1:36 pm
Moreover, deans are usually leery of getting entrenched in appointments matters for fear of stepping on the toes of the committee and the faculty when they make their respective votes. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:32 am by GiovannaShay
  But, to me, an even more interesting question is, no matter what decisions are taken, what if anything will change on the ground? [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:31 pm by Julian Ku
 As Kevin has already noted, Kagan will probably draw fire from the left since she has taken, as Solicitor General, some relatively aggressive stands on matters relating to executive powers in wartime. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:16 am by Howard Wasserman
Justice Kagan authored one of the opinions and she introduced it by calling it a "complicated procedural ruling. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:09 am by Josh Blackman
As a result, the Framers advocating ratification had no single view of the matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sessions’ legal aides have such an obligation in casual exchanges with him about proposed legislation (or for that matter about a judicial nominee). [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:59 pm by Lee Sims
The Law Librarian Blog has posted a snippet of the C-SPAN interview with Justice Kagan in which she admits to using a Kindle to read briefs. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm by Tom Goldstein
ACOG’s position mattered a lot in the public and legislative debates. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
To do so would mean that I have prejudged the matter or have morally committed myself to a certain position. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:30 pm by David Zaring
  I think that's why the reactions to the Kagan and Sotomayor nominations have been tepid (though that wasn't the case for John Roberts). [read post]