Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr" Results 221 - 240 of 878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix
In the Privy Council Samuel Robie v The Queen (Jamaica) will be heard on Tuesday 8 November by Lords Kerr, Clarke and Wilson, Dame Heather Hallett and Dame Janet Smith. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am by Laura Sandwell
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:39 am by SHG
  That it works matters. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Fourth Amendment allows the police to pull over a driver who has committed a traffic violation, and to detain that person for a reasonable period of time to investigate the traffic violation. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:55 pm by Ilya Somin
For my previous post and links to earlier posts by Sherry, myself and Orin Kerr, see here). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kerr, a George Washington University law professor in Washington, D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 4:24 am by SHG
An 80-year-old man was among those detained, then released, during the operationAs Orin properly notes, this would appear to fly in the face of Ybarra v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am by KIRSTEN SJØVOLL, MATRIX
It furthermore held that the authorities of the committees relied upon by the appellants was “slight” as a matter of international law, relying on Jones v Ministry of Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2007] 1 AC 270 at [23]. [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:06 am by ALEX BAILIN QC MATRIX
Lord Kerr, dissenting on that aspect, pointed to decisions such as Zenati v MPC [2015] QB 758 (in which a dilatory decision to discontinue a false passport prosecution engaged Article 5 rights) and Norris v USA #2 [2010] 2 AC 487 (obiter dicta concerning the applicability of art 8 regarding detention for the purpose of prosecution). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]