Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 221 - 240 of 3,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 8:29 am by J
She granted the application and set aside the writ as the false statement in the application for the writ amounted to an abuse of process.As to my (c), she accepted an undertaking by the defendants not to seek to re-enter the property until all matters had been resolved.I’d welcome any thoughts or comments on both the case and my analysis! [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 A: I want you to be able to reply to a C&D with “no, b/c X. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s not b/c India is a pirate nation or a net importer. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Valerie Katz
I sit down to start working on the interrogatories when Partner C calls.I leave the Partner A work and the Partner B work on my desk and go see Partner C. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 6:13 am by Benjamin Wittes
I’m not looking for a judgment that what DHS did was illegal. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§§ 1028(a)(2), (b)(1)(B), and (c)(3)(A); access device fraud under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§§ 1028(a)(2), (b)(1)(B), and (c)(3)(A); access device fraud under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§§ 1028(a)(2), (b)(1)(B), and (c)(3)(A); access device fraud under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The ED was of the opinion that the subject-matter of claim 1 contained surgical steps and as such was excluded from patentability.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):Method for determining the change or change in length of a first object (b) which is connected in an initial state to a second object (d) via a joint (k) and which has been changed after having been detached from the second object (d), wherein a reference system (e1) is attached… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:39 am by Alex Phipps
The Court then turned to (B) the automobile exception, and explained “[m]obility of the vehicle is a fundamental prerequisite to the application of the automobile exception. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
B/c of independent creation as a requirement/doctrine, which sets it off from TM and patent. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 1:19 pm by James Yang
Now, you might say that I’m taking it too far and not being reasonable. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:19 pm by Brandon W. Barnett
Before my wife and I had children, I was used to running quick errands to the store in a matter of minutes. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
On October 29, 2009, the taxpayer and his then wife executed a separation agreement which included exhibits A through M. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm by Marco Rossi
EU Directives are usually adopted through a number of legislative procedures depending on the different subject matters. [read post]