Search for: "Matter of Q. P."
Results 221 - 240
of 504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
He wants to shape how we frame the Q. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
Q: no, I’d still be irked, but maybe it would take away some of her anger. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Some favored uses even involve copying or knowing something about the P’s mark. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Authorial intent of creation of an exploitable copy should matter, which affects our analysis of bridal bouquets and tweets. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:03 pm
James Q. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 1:25 pm
For due process, see Q C-1 to C-27; for the resolution process, see Q D-1 to D-25, and for expedited hearings see Q E-1 to E-9:http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/pdf/OSEP_Q&A_memo7-23-13.pdfHere is the OSEP Topic Brief on Due Process Hearings:http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cdynamic%2CTopicalBrief%2C16%2C------- Thanks for subscribing! [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
In other words, the above-captioned matter has required substantial judicial resources. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:43 am
For public companies, an argument could be made that their 10-K and 10-Q filings are public record. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
Q: What implications on First Amendment/treatment of commercial speech? [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
Patent system classified according to subject matter; a different endeavor. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 3:49 pm
(o) for the passing of accounts,(p) fixing and approving the remuneration of a personal representative, or(q) subject to subrule (2), respecting any other matter concerning(i) an authorization to obtain estate information,(ii) an authorization to obtain resealing information,(iii) a grant of probate,(iv) a grant of administration with or without will annexed,(v) an ancillary grant,(vi) a resealing, or(vii) the office of… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
But raises practical Q: will a court accept such abstracted testimony as relevant? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Dilution: does consumer perception matter? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Eagle-eyed readers may have spotted that this weblog has yet to report on a 21 May 2015 IP decision from the Court of Justice of the European Union, (CJEU), this being Case C‑546/12 P Ralf Schräder v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO). [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
[Why would ability to circumvent matter there? [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am
Dad buys phone, gives it to kid—shouldn’t be able to get around the contract, but that’s a contract matter and not a DMCA matter. [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:30 am
(P. 21). [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
It’s on p.52 of their manifesto, here. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Finally, market for criticism doesn’t matter. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:49 pm
Among the discrepancies was the fact that the records for the Apartment (Including the 1997 and 1998 lease renewals, family income certifications and family composition certifications as shown in Exhibits P and Q to HPD's answer herein) Indicated a change in the head of the household (from the name of the head of the family previously occupying the Apartment to that Individual and Petitioner) yet no application for the change had been submitted to HPD (as required by… [read post]
