Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh" Results 221 - 240 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
In addition, the Court noticed that the 1940 Act, which was itself the successor legislation to the Arbitration Act, 1899, had raised similar questions, and that the courts had almost uniformly taken the view that there was no room to bring an ordinary civil suit to enforce an arbitration agreement “outside” the definition of that term in the 1940 Act (Meredith J., Gauri Singh v Ramlochan Singh and Chagla C.J., Natverlal Bhalakia)—this was a close analogy… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
Related posts:Fraudulent alienation of foreign immovables and the Moçambique rule in the Western Australian Court of Appeal Singh v Singh (2009) 253 ALR 575; [2009] WASCA 53,... [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The circumstances as to whether an administrative body will more likely exercise its discretion to hold an oral hearing often includes cases where credibility goes to the core of the issue before the administrative body: Singh v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The pitfalls of doing so are perhaps demonstrated by Singh [British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350]. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:42 am by INFORRM
  It does not, therefore, include cases such as BCA v Singh (discontinuance after adverse Court of Appeal ruling) or Fiddes v Channel Four (“drop hands” deal on the first day of trial). [read post]
Despite finding flaws in the monthly reviews of O’s detention between March and July 2011, the Court of Appeal dismissed her appeal; which meant that the matter entered the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In this respect there is a threat of a libel action stifling academic debate, and a similarity to BCA v Singh 2010 EWCA Civ 350, where opinions expressed in a controversy on what was essentially a scientific matter were at issue. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Rosalind English
The Court noted that the immigration officers had properly explored matters which needed to be explored. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am by INFORRM
He rightly points out that companies – by which he means trading companies – “already have a wide range of legal means to protect their brand and to prevent unfair competition” and draws attention to the notorious cases in which companies have brought (and, importantly, threatened) libel actions against individuals: the McLibel litigation, British Chiropractic Association v Singh, General Electric Healthcare v Professor Henrik Thomsen and the still… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by The Legal Blog
Persons affected by decisions of tribunals or courts have a right to expect that those exercising judicial functions will follow the reason or ground of the judicial decision in the earlier cases on identical matters".It has been opined that in the absence of a strict rule of precedent, litigants would take every case to the highest court, in spite of a ruling to the contrary, in the hope that the decision may be overruled.15) In Hari Singh v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The claimant in the case of HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group ([2010] EWHC 1294 (QB)) is seeking permission to appeal the decision of Mr Justice Eady staying the action because a trial would require the court to decide matters of religious doctrine. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:35 pm by INFORRM
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction over such matters. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 25 March, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Singh v Public Service Commission (Trinidad & Tobago). [read post]