Search for: "Matter of Smith v Joseph" Results 221 - 240 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
Other issues turned aside included these: * An appeal by Joseph P. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 12:23 pm
NATHAN JOSEPH SMITH, Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Lynn, MA; Peter Smith, President) Bain Cor, Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
  The trial court decision, a frankly astonishing one, came in the case of Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen, who’d spent fifteen years in prison after being convicted of sexually molesting some children in Lorain in 1994. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:04 am
On May 20, 2009, the CCA granted review in the the following three cases:PD-1805-08, Joseph Denver Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
Overstock.com Q4 2008 violated GAAP by failing to restate prior financial reports to correct a material accounting error and instead recognized a one-time gain to show its first profit in 15 quarters (Details here).Lee Webb from Stockwatch chronicled my year long battle with Overstock.com to successfully force the company to comply with SEC Regulation G for certain non-GAAP financial disclosures and my ongoing battle to force the company to comply with GAAP and SEC rules in reporting accounting… [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
  That approach was also affirmed by the current Supreme Court in the ITW v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Joseph, No. 065911 Conviction for using the Internet to solicit a person defendant believed to be a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2422(b), is vacated and case is remanded for a new trial where the jury was permitted to convict on an invalid legal basis. [read post]