Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 221 - 240
of 19,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
Simply this: Your firm’s brand matters. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 6:09 am
If (a) you are running a business that has a commitment as part of ingrained policy to obey the law; (b) President Obama announces that his administration will for the time being not be enforcing the law with regard, e.g., to existing insurance policies, or for that matter, the employer mandate; (c) is there a sound argument that you should not obey the law because it’s not being enforced and because the governing authorities actually don’t want you to… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:53 am
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Jeffrey T. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:00 am
As neither the appellant nor respondent 1 had presented said matter in their submissions according to Article 12(1) and (2) RPBA, it was not within the scope of the present appeal. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The agreement further provided that the corporate tenant – East Coast Fish Market Inc d/b/a Lamia’s Fish Market – would pay some rent, together with use and occupancy on a go-forward basis. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:19 am
For those interested in the topic, I highly recommend a 2015 article in The Business Lawyer by Peter B. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Female Infant B. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:59 am
After more rounds, Meggitt added a Lanham Act false advertising claim.First, the court ruled that the claim had to satisfy Rule 9(b) because, though one could allege negligent false advertising (comment: or for that matter faultless false advertising; that’s what strict liability means), if the plaintiff alleges a unified course of fraudulent conduct then Rule 9(b) applies. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:35 am
It couldn't be presumed that all members of the class were deceived by Synapse’s postcards. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
I think it's abundantly clear that there's no controlling California Supreme Court precedent that governs the issue as to whether California requires the (b)(3) prerequisites to be met even in (b)(2) -- or, for that matter, (b)(1) -- cases.So there's flexibility there.And there's substantial reason to make the rules different. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
When Mother didn’t appeal the removal order, she established “the law of the case,” and that law established subject matter jurisdiction in South Carolina. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:39 am
It will take years of court decisions to flesh out what “fair notice” and “public interest” mean, but the answer probably won’t matter since “could constitute” is a license to substitute possibilities for probabilities in the elements of all violations. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
It therefore provides the means to stop applicants, in reply to the first communication, dropping existing claims, replacing them by switching to unsearched and non-unitary subject-matter extracted from the description, i.e., claiming different subject-matter in sequence rather than simultaneously (T 274/03 [4], T 915/03 [3], T 1285/11 [2]). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
(b) The duration of the marriage. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:31 am
” Because of the “massive amount of attention” paid to FilmOn’s relationship to copyright infringement, DoubleVerify’s reports clearly concerned a matter of interest to the public. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
The court dismissed the claims, mainly because the advertisements were not misleading as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
A further repetition of the process of Example 8 performed by the appellant, the experimental details of which were provided in Annex B of letter dated 8 March 2013, confirmed said conclusion. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
The Juvenile Code defines a custodian in the context of a delinquency matter as “[t]he person or agency that has been awarded legal custody of a juvenile by a court. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Furthermore, in its written submissions in the aftermath of the EBA’s decision G 1/08, [the opponent] presented several arguments as to why the product claims contained in [the patent proprietor’s] requests should be regarded as non-patentable under A 53(b). [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Moreover, the technical features S, T and U relating to the user interface and screen display apparatus are defined with reference to the dialysis machine and are closely related to its functional interaction therewith. [read post]
